User talk:86.29.141.122

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Moshino31. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Moshino31 (talk) 21:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 22:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I vandalised in one go (yes it was for two different articles), but it's unfair to give me a warning and then a final warning and then I'm blocked, because as far as I can see it was one vandalism that I did."

Decline reason: "You repeatedly vandalised userpages and made it clear you would continue. It isn't about "fair", it isn't a game. — IrishGuy talk 22:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Okay fair enough (even though I didn't vandalise after that I made that comment and was about to revert my edit to TheElfoid, but he already did so). How about I make some good simple edit like grammar, spelling etc and I prove my worthiness? One more thing; how long am I blocked for?"

Decline reason: "No. You could have proven that you would not vandalise by not vandalising. Now, you are blocked for 31 hours. — Yamla (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I appologise. The temptation overpowered me. I've had my fun now though and I want to contribute to Wikipedia, but I am unable to do so, because I have been blocked. Wikipedia needs me! If that's not possible how about lowering my block to 15 hours?"

Decline reason: "If you truly want to contribute then there's no harm in waiting 31 hours. — Golbez (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.