User talk:86.164.248.168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Re: Rawlins

Your current edit to User_talk:128.220.212.154‎ seem more reasonable since the situation is actually explained, rather than the potentially ambiguous "this user is xyz", which can easily be seen as an invasion of an ip user's deliberately chosen privacy. May I suggest that you list Rawlins' potential sock-puppets on the alleged auto-biographical article's talk page (thus centralizing such information)? Ardent†alk 03:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Remarks on the Talk page of the vanity page cause a torrent of obscene abuse, with no reply to the point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.4.21 (talk) 09:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Assuming the above comment came from yourself (may I suggest getting a useraccount to make such discussions easier?), if that is indeed the case, then perhaps it is time to take the matter to a dispute resolution process such as formal mediation or arbitration. Ardent†alk 07:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)