User talk:86.16.33.183

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
It is suspected that this IP address has been used by Hellomoto5.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Hellomoto5. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Rudget Contributions 17:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Rudget Contributions 17:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GlassCobra 17:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

attacks, false templates

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] December 2007

Please do not continue to make disruptive edits to your talk page, such as adding offensive content or personal attacks. Please respond with civil communication if you believe notices are in error, or visit the sandbox to experiment. Thank you. Alexfusco5 16:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Example

Alexfusco i want to see an example of these offensives comments or attacks, i believe you are reporting unfairly


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Alexfusco5/guestbook, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:KnowledgeOfSelf, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 62 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i want to see an example of these offensives comments or attacks, i believe you are reporting unfairly"

Decline reason: "example, example, example, decline. No further unblock requests will be needed, please. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Please don't add inaccurate template

You keep adding a template regarding this IP that doesn't seem to be accurate. Whois data doesn't mention the organization you have placed in the template, and your edit history is more consistent with a stable than with a shared IP. Please don't restore that template; I would hate to have to remove your ability to edit this talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NOT inaccurate templates

Gd2help.com rents ip addresses from around the world and uses this ip address as a proxy server for clients.

That's not verified by the data we have access to, and it seems unwise to take just the word of someone whose only edits have been vandalism. I have double-checked your edits to see what I could verify, though, and added a more appropriate template. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to John Day (printer) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to John Day (printer) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to John Day (printer) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


Your recent edit to SR Merchant Navy Class (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Rudget. 18:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to SR Merchant Navy Class. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 20:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Day (printer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BuddingJournalist 20:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Wikiwayman, you will be blocked from editing. Onorem♠Dil 20:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hawaiian Islands, you will be blocked from editing. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mexican Werewolf in Texas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks Astral (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Friniates constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks Astral (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Astral. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Astral (talk) 15:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Astral. Astral (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 10 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 15:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "the outside proxy port has now been closed"

Decline reason: "This address has been blocked for vandalism, not for being a proxy. Request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Meant that vandals had access to wikipedia through the proxy"

Decline reason: "There is no way to verify that what you say is true. If it IS true, then in 10 days when the block expires, we will see no more vandalism from this IP address. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Super Smash Bros. Melee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Super Smash Bros. Melee.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. joshschr (Talk | contribs) 11:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to 2008 UEFA Champions League Final has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ma Ying-jeou. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ma Ying-jeou was changed by 86.16.33.183 (u) (t) deleting 16510 characters on 2008-05-23T15:59:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nigerian Red Cross Society. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ma Ying-jeou.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cenarium (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)