User talk:86.16.103.211

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Warnings

[edit] November 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to March 1, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to March 1. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:86.16.103.211. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

The suggestion that my contribution was not constructive is untrue and insulting. Do not remove it again, it is a legitimate piece of history.

I'd love to discuss it with you, but if you add it again, it will be removed and you will be warned again. Please discuss the notability of the subject on the talk page. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I think the notability is quite clear if you follow the links to it. I can see why your page has been vandalised so many times, you're a prick. This is a legitimate piece of history and I'll report you if you vandalise it again. here's another point. on a page filled with events of people we've never heard of (like spanish footballers) how the hell can you consider an issue like the hunger strike as being insignificant? idiot!

Your unwillingness to discuss the topic rationally gives merit to the fact that you can't explain its notability. I await your reasoned response. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

it is notable because it is a very significant moment in the history of The Troubles. you haven't given a reason as to why it's not notable. I'm reporting you for vandalism.

Tell me why that specific event, involving that specific person is notable and changes the lives of someone in China? That's global notability. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Days of the year for ideas. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

it affected the world as much as any human rights issue and attracted global attention. just 'cos you obviously know fuck all about it doesn't make it insignificant.

[edit] Personal attacks

Hello. Please do not resort to personal attacks such as "you're a prick" or "idiot" and so on when discussing articles or you will be blocked from editing. Try to discuss in a civil manner. Thank you, --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

i found his attitude to be quite insulting, particularly as he deleted them so quickly he wouldn't have even had time to follow the links and read what the story was about. i find his attitude towards others contributing to be quite vandalistic. i also believe that this event is no less important than other events on here (unless you can honestly tell me that every one submitted had a profound and immediate effect on the entire world)! i don't think so.