User talk:86.150.124.233

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nick Knowles, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nick Knowles was changed by 86.150.124.233 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-01T15:34:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting warnings

Please do not delete comments/warnings on your userpage. If this is a shared IP address and you did not make the change, please disregard it (but do not delete it) and consider creating a username account to avoid these messages. Thank you and happy new year. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 16:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zoë Lister, you will be blocked from editing. ~Eliz81(C) 19:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 19:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is unreasonable considering the informaton regarding Zoe Lister is in fact true. She has confirmed this on both TV and in print"

Decline reason: "Even giving you the benefit of the doubt on this issue (which I am not), this does not address the other recent vandalism from this IP. Block is legitimate. --Kinu t/c 19:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "While i see your point, i am stuck as to how you could doubt that particular edit considering kinu is from Texas so therefre unlikely to have seen the TV interviews pertaining to her beauty habits"

Decline reason: "Nothing but vandalism from this IP. — B (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.