User talk:86.137.164.37

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
  • Your own user page.
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
  • The ability to start new pages.
  • The ability to rename pages.
  • The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
  • The ability to upload images.
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
  • The eligibility to become an administrator.
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. -- KHM03 14:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Christianity

Please discuss your proposed edit on the talk page. It seems that it keeps getting removed as a violation of WP:NPOV. Let's talk about it and see how it goes. Thanks...KHM03 14:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Three revert rule

Hi, Deanna, I posted two messages to you on the Christianity talk page last night, telling you of POV problems that I found with your edit. Of course, the existence of POV is, to a certain extent, itself a POV, so one person could in good faith believe that his or her edit was perfectly neutral, while others disagreed. However, I also warned you that you were already grossly in violation of the Three revert rule, which you might not have known about at that stage. And I told you of typos in that section that you kept inserting and reinserting and reinserting. I also said I wasn't going to report you. The fact that you have now reinserted that edit again, in the knowledge that you're violating a Wikipedia rule, and with no attempt to correct errors such as "confilcting", "incase", and "it's", gives a rather poor impression of collaboration, in my view. Again, I'm not going to report the 3RR violation, but if you keep it up, someone else almost certainly will, and it will probably sour your early Wikipedia experience. As KHM03 said, please discuss things on the talk page. I know you have posted there, but you haven't responded to the 3RR violations, and you've completely ignored the point about the typos. If you try to discuss, you'll probably find that we're quite a nice bunch of editors. On some of the other pages I've been on, you would almost certainly have been reported at this stage. Good luck. AnnH (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)