User talk:85.58.42.28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have declined you WP:AIV report, User:Maurice27's actions do not fit the definition of vandalism - also note...

Please don't accuse editors of vandalism unless you're absolutely sure they have committed it. In particular, avoid using the word in edit summaries (such as "reverting vandalism"), and be very careful about posting vandalism warning templates on user's talkpages. Review the vandalism policy thoroughly before you do that, and see especially the section "What vandalism is not". Note that content disputes are not vandalism, and that good-faith edits of any kind, even if you think them misguided, are not to be considered vandalism. Vandalism accusations without any basis in policy are bad for the climate on the wiki and make constructive discussion more difficult. See WP:VAND: "If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as such, then it is he or she who is actually harming the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors." See also Wikipedia:Avoid the word "vandal".

Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Països Catalans. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I also have to say the same thing about related articles such as Mediterranean Sea. Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)