User talk:85.226.235.206

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Geske

Hi, the main thing it needs is inline citations.

Here's a guide to standard expected for B class: Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, NPOV or NOR. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling-in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Examples of B articles: Alfred Hitchcock (as of July 2006), Aleš Hemský (as of September 2006), Joshua Toulmin (as of October 2006)

Tom (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sources?

Do you have any sources for the additions you made to the article on Charles XIII of Sweden? If not, your edits will be removed shortly. LarRan (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. However, my remark had nothing to do with things being 'sensitive'. It's just that it's very much to prefer in an encyclopaedia like wikipedia, that statements can be sourced. Regards, LarRan (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Elisabeth Frösslind - Sources needed for verification of information

Dear editor, I would like to request you to please give your source for these edits you made to Elisabeth Frösslind. Your edit summaries are "Chapter one" and "Chapter two", which I take to mean you are obtaining the information from a book of some sort? Please also be aware of the copyright policy, which means you cannot simply copy words from another source. Would you please take the time to place your sources into citation templates to verify the information you are adding? Thanks! Ariel♥Gold 12:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahhh, I see. Well, the information still needs to be cited, so it would be best if you could take a look at the templates, put the book into a template, and use a multiple reference system to cite each section, for verifiability, and to let readers know where the passages come from. Thanks for your reply, it is very much appreciated! Also, would you consider finding some English sources, as this is the English Wikipedia, the Swedish book is not something that readers could most likely find, or read, lol. Ariel♥Gold 12:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Account?

Hello there! You seem to be fairly active here. Have you considered registering an account? It'll make communications with other editors much easier and only takes a few seconds. Cheers! henrik•talk 22:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)