User talk:84.69.124.97

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I've been blocked for 6 months. I see this as incredibly harsh and unnecessarily over the top. This seems to be because I used this IP address for "sockpuppetting" (I didn't even know what this was earlier today). My account, Ln of x was blocked so I tried to edit when I was not logged in and it allowed me to. I had no idea I was commiting such a heinous crime, to which user : philippe seems to have massively overreracted, and now I've been blocked for 6 months !! This is frankly an absurd length of time. What have I done, chopped off someone's head ? I'd really appreciate it if this could be reviewed, and perhaps the block reduced to something of the order of magnitude of 48 hours. The reason my the account Ln of x was blocked was due to me putting back my edits (which had been justified at some length and had been there for several weeks) when a couple of other users persisted in deleting them Thank you."

Decline reason: "To be honest, all of your edits, with both of your accounts and this IP seem to be a combination of really odd commentary and simple vandalism. You were warned about this many times a given a series of short blocks and I can see no productive discussion of these problems; certainly nothing 'justified at length'. You then started editing anonymously and with a sock. I really don't see any compelling reason to question this action. Kuru ^talk 22:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.