User talk:84.44.172.245

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I see.

So one can simply "own" a topic, and prevent factual updates by experts in the field?

So in this case you see this as a battle:

Expert who understands, performs, teaches and is trained in the analysis of the risks and benefits of circumcision..

vs.

Someone who was circumcised


I have been using this servce, teaching medicine and evidence based medicine for some time now and my students consistently tell me I do it well. I feel I must not be so synical with my first attempts to join in the party and correct factual mistakes to believe that anyone would want to substitute personal opinion in place of confirmed evidence - or even that anyone would want to do that.

Perhaps my attitude is Pollyannish, but I believe that I do know that a small portion of this material is factually incorrect and it would be valuable to persons using this information to read a factually correct article.

Yes, he can keep reverting the changes, but each time he has provided feedback as to the form and not the content of the changes.

Perhaps you can help me with a description of the hierarchy of this site - certainly there is an appeal process for disputes?

Thanks for joining in - please respond when you have a chance.

Bill Williamwells 04:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)