User talk:83.67.73.117
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bosniaks. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Ronz 19:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Duja► 07:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Bosniaks
Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the discussions in Talk:Bosniaks. However, I hope you aren't offended by my reminding you to please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Bosniaks is a controversial article with often heated discussions. It's best to closely follow talk page guidelines and keep a cool head even when you think others are not. --Ronz 21:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Bosniaks for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Also see WP:BATTLE and WP:SOAP. Thanks! --Ronz 21:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. --Ronz 16:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Apparently any non-serb oppinion is inappropriate to you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.73.117 (talk • contribs) 3 December 2007
Please note that a report on your editing has been started in Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#user:83.67.73.117. Please consider contributing to the discussion. Thanks! --Ronz 17:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Balkans arbitration remedy
In a recently-closed arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision, which this message is intended to do. Stifle (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiquette alert
Your concern about User:Ronz was examined and considered. I didn't see any evidence presented of incivility on his part. I'd like you to read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, which is a fundamental policy of Wikipedia. Also, I believe a read-through of ad hominem would be helpful. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 18:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |