User talk:83.246.118.110

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

--Michael Billington (talk) 09:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Using TOR is not forbidden. See links below. (To reviewing admin: in case of declining, PLEASE don't remove these very informative links. Thank you in advance.)"


Decline reason: "TOR accounts may be blocked, actually. See WP:TOR for more information. — Rjd0060 (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Armedblowfish&oldid=136240411 : "(...) AB has made nearly 6000 edits to the project, with about 2500 of those being to the mainspace. AB has been a member of Wikipedia's Mediation Committee since July 2006. (...)" "(...) AB edits Wikipedia from a Tor proxy (...)"

Moreover, according to Mr. Jimbo Wales it is OK to use TOR: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=143559040 : "I am a strong supporter of people using Tor to edit Wikipedia, and I think the current situation is quite unfortunate. There are complications to be sure, but the idea that admins can use Tor, while ordinary users can not, does not strike me as particularly appropriate. Anyone who is a normal trusted editor ought to be able to use Tor if they like... and why not?"

Cheers. 83.246.118.110 (talk) 14:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)