User talk:83.141.69.18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during December 13, 2006 (UTC) to Donovan McNabb

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Rlfb 11:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Celbridge. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. WODUP () 10:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Confey College. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. WODUP () 10:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello, 83.141.69.18, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that recently there have been potentially unwanted edits made using this IP or account. Therefore, for the time being, your edits will be monitored closely to make sure that they are in accord with our policies and guidelines, and reverted if necessary. I just thought I should let you know. WODUP () 10:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Salesian College Celbridge, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Peripitus (Talk) 11:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Confey College, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Peripitus (Talk) 11:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Leixlip has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 12:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Myanw 10:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Leixlip. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CIreland 12:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

[edit] Regarding edits made during March 12, 2007 (UTC) to Leixlip

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Myanw 12:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during May 11, 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Alex Bakharev 10:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 28

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of people known as The Great. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --OnoremDil 13:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)