User talk:83.138.172.79

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 83.138.172.79, is registered to RSPC-UK-Net2Roam-Ltd. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact RSPC-UK-Net2Roam-Ltd to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, RSPC-UK-Net2Roam-Ltd, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Contents


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Aston Villa F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Woodym555 20:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007 (further vandalism)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Infant baptism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lima 19:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to God in Islam. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. → AA (talk) — 16:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bugatti Veyron, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bugatti Veyron was changed by 83.138.172.79 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-21T19:50:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Comparison of ATI Graphics Processing Units, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. The Xenos GPU in the Xbox 360 is made by ATI, so it should be listed in this article -- Imperator3733 (talk) 07:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to IS-95, you will be blocked from editing. A link to your edit can be seen here. ✬Dillard421✬ (talk • contribs) 08:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Annoyance, you will be blocked from editing. Goochelaar (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Blessington

While your edits to Blessington are most likely true, please provide verifiable sources for your statements per the guidelines. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 22:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nibiru, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not edit the Nibiru disambiguation page - as it stands it is correct. Doug Weller (talk) 06:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Nibiru

Did you see my response? I don't seem to be the only one who is having problems with your edits.--Doug Weller (talk) 21:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Coccyx. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gwernol 12:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

There was no commentary or "personal alanlysis" as you call it. It was formal and if you wish to discuss it please do so instead of referring to NPOV which your edit was clearly not, hence your reason for disguising it as a "minor" edit. -83.138.172.79 (talk) 17:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Adding "Argued to be" misrepresents the source and is an attempt to put your own spin onto the factual material in the article. I did not mark my edit as minor, so your claim that I was "disguising" it is incorrect. Gwernol 18:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
It does NOT misrepresent the source. You should notice that the source actually has an overall different tone, that it is not a remnant of a tail. To use it as a "reference" that it is the remnant of a tail is the classic intellectually dishonest quoting out of reference. It is the "owners" of the article putting their own spin onto factual material in the article. As for your edit, you may or may not have marked your edit as minor, but the system history says you did and that was against policy for marking edits as minor when they could be disputed. 83.138.172.79 (talk) 22:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gas turbine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. MBisanz talk 07:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. MBisanz talk 07:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Portroe GAA (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Illuminati (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)