User talk:82.68.153.36
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Old warnings
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Doc (?) 10:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to F.U.C.K., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 10:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
... Another example of masculine repression of women
- I apologize for my indecisiveness in what to do with the page, and I shouldn't have posted a vandalism warning (sorry, hit the wrong button ... tonight's just not my night). However, you replaced a perfectly valid and necessary redirect with an article on a non-notable topic (159 hits).
An article on this organization has already been deleted by majority consensus (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F.U.C.K.) and as such cannot be recreated without a supermajority to "undelete."If your article had not replaced a necessary redirect, it would have been speedily deleted underCSD/G4 andCSD/A7. As the redirect, however, should not be deleted I simply removed your changes to it. If you would like to campaign to preserve your article, I suggest that you register for an account and create an article on the topic independent of the current redirect (titled perhaps "Feminists Uncovering Censorship Knowledgeably"); if the article is not deleted, you can then create a disambig page in place of the current F.U.C.K. article that redirects to both your article and the album. (You might be aware that anonymous users are not allowed to create new pages, which you bypassed by converting an existing article into an article on a totally different topic.) You might also consider contributing information about F.U.C.K. to the article on Feminism, where you'll be less likely to be attacked by notability policies. Believe it or not, I actually support F.U.C.K.'s cause, and my removal of your article has nothing to do with "masculine repression of women." I appologize for the inconvenience, but we simply have to hold to certain policies to preserve the integrity of Wikipedia. If you still disagree with me or have any questions, please feel free to contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 10:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Just to add another note, my decision on this page is in way binding. If you truly believe F.U.C.K. to be a notable organization, by all means restore the text I deleted (it's all stored in the article's history) and I'll nominate it for WP:AfD, where multiple users will give their input as to the notability of the organization and decisions are made only by consensus. If you choose do that, however, I would urge you to read over WP:N, WP:BIO, and Wikipedia:Deletion first. Once again, feel free to ask me if you have any questions. AmiDaniel (Talk) 11:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to SETI. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 11:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.
[edit] October 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page History of chocolate worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Carlosguitar 08:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Tube (2003 TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Harland1 16:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Feb 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Carleton Watkins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. hike395 (talk) 05:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to African nationalism. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Klausness (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |