User talk:82.45.80.45

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 12:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 12:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Longhair\talk 12:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

-- Longhair\talk 12:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is a shared IP address. Also, it appears from the talk page that whoever was making these edits still had one 'strike' left"

Decline reason: "The editing history is more consistent with a stable IP, but when the block is over, you are welcome to demonstrate that you are a different, more useful editor. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Swimming pool. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 09:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Swimming pool, you will be blocked from editing. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 09:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Swimming pool, you will be blocked from editing. Stephenb (Talk) 09:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked for a period of 104 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 09:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ailanthus altissima. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --RobertG ♬ talk 13:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ailanthus altissima. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Prashanthns (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bee Movie

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Bee Movie, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of The Apprentice candidates (UK)

This user has vandalised List of The Apprentice candidates (UK) on a number of occasions.(80.193.99.43 (talk) 08:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to El Señor Presidente has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurch (talk) 14:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to El Señor Presidente. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Karanacs (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Edward Steptoe.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... discospinster talk 15:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The notability of the subject Edward Steptoe is asserted in the link from Historylink, an encyclopedia of Washington history. This means that speedy deletion does not apply per WP:CSD#A7. However, you had tagged the article as WP:CSD#G1, when it is not "an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content". Since your previous few edits were vandalism, I took a shot in the dark. ... discospinster talk 15:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Coeliac disease, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Coeliac disease was changed by 82.45.80.45 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-18T11:04:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Coeliac disease. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Coeliac disease was changed by 82.45.80.45 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-18T11:08:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Coeliac disease.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. -XxKibaxX Talk 14:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 14:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I hardy think accidently removing a few <--'s is reason to block someone."

Decline reason: "That vandalism was part of a pattern including obscenity and general immaturity. I see no reason to unblock — Woody (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Weymouth appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. RapidR (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Weymouth

Please would you stop vandalising the Weymouth article. (Weymouth is very clearly and obviously not a village, so your continual changes to that effect can only reasonably be considered vandalism.)--85.158.139.99 (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

There's a "Weymouth Town Centre Management Group" listed by the borough council: not a "Village Centre Management Group". Please stop trying to impose your individual ideas on Wikipedia. If you want to discuss it, please do so on the article's talk page. --RobertG ♬ talk 16:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I didn't see Weymouth called a village on any of the sources I checked; do you have other sources? You should discuss them on the talk page rather than edit-warring; if you are right and can prove it to the satisfaction of the community, then your desired changes will stand, while if you keep forcing through your desired changes without discussion, you'll just be blocked again. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of three days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "blocked for one edit made by someone else ?"

Decline reason: "It's an astounding coincidence, your trying to edit just three minutes after 'someone else' used your ip to vandalize Wikipedia. Yes, unfortunately, 'someone else's' vandalism has made it necessary for us to disable anonymous editing from this ip for now. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Failure has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 29 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Oil shale. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mikenorton (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Oil shale‎.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. Waggers (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bratislava. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aleenf1 12:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)