User talk:82.45.163.4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks very much for reformatting the template. It brings it in line with others and easier to read etc. I hope i get the hang of that in the future. Simply south 23:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, 82.45.163.4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Simply south 23:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Chingford Branch Line

Please do not re-direct to the Lea Valley Page. Also, it would be preferable if you would register with Wikipedia if you wish to continue to edit articles. If you continue to re-direct, then I shall use WP:3RR. Canterberry 16:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent work on the Lea Valley lines is vandalism, especially as you are not a registered used ( a frequent sign of a vandal. I hereby issue you with a warning. Canterberry 13:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits has been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I have warned Canterberry about this lack of Good faith. Please ignore the above warning. – Tivedshambo (talk) 22:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bill Bailey

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Bailey. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- JediLofty User | Talk 12:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

My fault - I accidentally marked my edit as a revert, when it was actually undoing the effects of an edit prior to yours. Sorry about that. --McGeddon 13:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I was reverting this anonymous user's assertion that "Unfortunatley Bailey has recived critsism for his inabilty to write his own jokes. He has called upon the help of Alan Car, Eric Prydz (the man behind Pink Floyd) and MC Lars" which is just unsourced drivel! -- JediLofty User | Talk 13:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tube map

I don't really understand why you have decided a tube map published by TfL showing London Overground as it is planned in 2010 is "irrelevant" to an article discussing the future of London Overground in the context of the Tube network. I thought it illustrated that section of the article perfectly. If you have a more relevant example please do put it in its place, but without some sort of context, the article is somewhat diminished.

All the best --Cnbrb 14:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, I take the point about it being too prominent in the article. I reckon it's still worth citing, but if it seems out of place where it was, I've added it as a reference at the bottom, with a "health warning" that it's only an illustration and subject to change. I feel this is better than just deleting it, as it does illustrate TfL's current proposals, even if it's not set in stone. I hope you think this is OK and fits in better with the article. Best, --Cnbrb 15:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Overground

I refer you to discussions at WT:RAIL#London_Overground and related ones elsewhere. If you aren't a sock of someone else, please create a proper userid thank you. --AlisonW (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2007 (UTC)