User talk:82.44.28.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] UK Ministers' infoboxes

Please stop modifying the infoboxes of sitting UK cabinet ministers. The infoboxes as they are now are correct. --Philip Stevens (talk) 12:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Infoboxes

If you don't give any rationale for the edits you keep making to infoboxes (eg Healey's) they are likely to be reverted. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Guy Goma

Would you please state how you know Guy Goma's exact date of birth? Thankk you, Badagnani (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ian Gilmour, Baron Gilmour of Craigmillar

Please don't add flags to show subjects' places of birth and death. Per WP:FLAG this practice is deprecated. On a common sense basis, it is difficult to see what this addition would add to the article. Thank you. --John (talk) 19:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and we don't use capitals in section headings. So we would have "Early life", not "Early Life", for example. --John (talk) 19:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] John Biffen

Please see my two messages to you above regarding formatting and the use of flag icons. --John (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 17:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I have just reviewed the last few dozen edits you made. Many of them introduced errors into articles which I had to correct. As I pointed out to you twice above, we do not use flag icons in infoboxes to show places of birth or death. Neither do we capitalise words other than proper nouns in section headings. I accept that your intentions are good, but you need to accept that our project works on consensus, and that it is important to follow agreements like this that the broader community has made if you wish to edit here. If you continue to introduce or restore errors to articles I will have to consider the net value of your contributions to the project to be negative and withdraw your editing privileges for a while. That would be a shame as I know you are trying to help. Please think seriously about this. Thank you. --John (talk) 18:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UK Ministers' infoboxes

Please stop putting 'present' in term_end, this removes the incumbent banner from the box. --Philip Stevens (talk) 12:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Last warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Gummer, you will be blocked from editing. --John (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Frankie Boyle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 22:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Penistone and Stocksbridge (UK Parliament constituency) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 17:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Penistone and Stocksbridge (UK Parliament constituency). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf How can I help? 17:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Gove, you will be blocked from editing. --John (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Michael Gove, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --RedZionX 20:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Trusilver 20:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to 2008, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Greg Mulholland, you will be blocked from editing. PamD (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Scottish Parliament election, 2007, you will be blocked from editing. Mifter (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You have been Blocked from editing

 Regretfully, your actions are damaging and disrupting the project. In order to prevent further damage, and in accordance with the blocking policy, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days.

During your time away, please reflect on your actions, and realise that your contributions really are welcome here. However, editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right, and vandalism will not be tolerated. When you return, why not pick a task from this page and make some constructive edits? You'll enjoy it a lot more!

Kind regards,
Anthøny 20:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by
adding the text "{{unblock|your reason here}}" below this text, or contact me.

[edit] Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Rodhullandemu (Talk) 20:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Boris Johnson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Prescott, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 17:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Liberal Democrats. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 17:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked yet again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. One day after your last block expires and you're back with the same disruption. You've had previous blocks and many warnings. Your next block will be your last one here.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)