User talk:82.43.170.96

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Battle of Agincourt

Hi, you seem to have reverted to an old version of the Agincourt article, without explaining why. The version you've reverted to contains a lot of stuff which is at the very least controversial. E.g. "the famous 2 fingures were pointed at the French followed by much cursing" is not supported by any contemporary account I know. The figures you've used for troop numbers are endlessly argued about because the primary sources don't agree.

Please discuss any changes you wish to make, rather than just reverting to an older version you prefer.

Thanks,

--Merlinme 15:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Rorke's Drift. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 20:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battle Of Agincourt (Warning)

This is the second time I've had to post here after you've reverted to a bad version of the Battle of Agincourt article. If you do it again, I will ask for you to be blocked. I sincerely hope that will not be necessary.

Thanks.

--Merlinme 12:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion about Battle of Agincourt

Thank you for entering into a discussion about Agincourt. However, quite apart from the fact that the numbers used in the article now suggest a range, reflecting the fact that there aren't any definitive primary sources for the numbers, by reverting to a very old version you destroy all the work that has been done on the article since. Also, there are many spelling and grammatical errors in the version you revert to, and many examples of highly dubious claims (e.g. putting up two fingers to the French).

If you particularly object to the figures used, please start a new section on the Agincourt discussion page and we can talk about it, and hopefully reach some community consensus.

Thanks,

--Merlinme 16:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Support regarding Battle Of Agincourt

I fully support your attempts to balance the article and to counter one persons work with the vast majority who disagree with it, perhaps we can work together on it. Twobells (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)