User talk:82.40.54.230

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edit to Keith Lasley

Your recent edit to Keith Lasley (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Keith Lasley. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ⇒Bayerischermann - 22:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Andrew Dolan, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ⇒Bayerischermann - 22:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia, as you did in Keith Lasley. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ⇒Bayerischermann - 22:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

If you honestly believe it is a violation of copyright, see Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Copyright. But DO NOT continue to disrupt the article. ⇒Bayerischermann - 22:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


The picture is copyright. It clearly has this printed in the bottom right corner. The copyright holder, Rodger Price Photography, has contacted WIKI but nothing has been done to remove this image. If you examine the metadata you will see that his details are in there. I have been asked by Mr Rodger Price to act on his behalf to remove any copyright images that are used on the web. He has also requested the details of the person responsible for uploading the image to allow him to bill that person for the use of the image. Regards G. Price.

I apologise for the mistake I made. Rest assured it won't happen again. I would have been receptive and talked earlier but due to my work have not had a chance and after reading the originally left comment on my space where you decided to abuse me rather than talk then I feel less inclined to offer my assistance. It was not my intention to theif a copyrighted image and again I do apologise. As for billing me I think that's rather over the top for an honest mistake. Again I apologise and I assure you it was not my intention to steal an image and I shall leave it there for now. Regards A. Dolan