User talk:82.39.9.197

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Renetto

Your recent edit to Renetto (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AnnH ♫ 20:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - Cate | Talk 20:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a user's page, as you did with User:Cate, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mufka 20:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] research

There are already a lot of vandalism in wikipedia. Instead of waste our time, you should investigate existing vandalism. Research is also observation. And your vandalism is an high level (contrary of most of vandalism). I noticed that you know the policy (and used countrary of common sense, so your vandalism is not representative. - Cate | Talk 20:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Your argument is specious - experimentation with vandalism is still vandalism and will be dealt with according to processes set out in Wikipedia:Vandalism. (aeropagitica) 21:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christ

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 21:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism of Bible

User added template {{nonsense}} to page with edit summary RVV. This is a sophisticated vandal who knows something about Wikipedia procedures, clearly this individual knows the warnings and doesn't need them. --Shirahadasha 22:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Same method, the same day (5 dec 2006), used for vandalizing Arab: see [1]. This user should be blocked. -- Womtelo 23:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
As you can note from above, the vandal was already blocked. Unfortunatelly we forgot to revert all vandalism. Cate | Talk 09:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)