User talk:82.35.210.119

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please, if this is Ray editing this then you have a serious problem with wanting to be related to this school. You all of sudden started editing as of Jan 3rd and now have to wait till the paint dries before you cry vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnuldlayne (talk • contribs)

Hey, we from America deal with our own things, you in the UK deal with your stuff. Just stay on your side of the pond ok, cause I don't mess with your stuff —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnuldlayne (talk • contribs) 23:33, 8 January 2008

[edit] question

I have a question for you 82, why do you care so much, what do you have to gain by fixing everything? Quoting wikipedia policy/goals for the internet doesn't really say much about your personal opinion. I have nothing to gain myself yet I only do what I do to make sure that the truth about topics is shown to the world. If one thing was said or changed it is not if the public couldn't find out what every contributor put on the page. As long as someone wants to go search all the revisions of the page they would find all they need to know. To some you might appear in two different points of view and I the same. But would it in the end be really that important to change all that has been redone? Not surprising this website (wiki) has been vandalized everyday by hundreds of people, heck I had a teacher do it just to prove a point that Wikipedia is completely a work of opinions in the form of a website that you or I can change on a whim without any needed checks and balances. I'm not saying that my edits are right but I'm saying that if anyone sees this site as in your words, "are positive, neutral, and well-sourced" then that is false. Any place where individuals can control the content in a matter in seconds is complete the opposite of that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnuldlayne (talk • contribs) 01:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Trolling on my page

Please refrain from trolling my talk page. If you have anything encyclopedic to discuss, go to Talk:Inchkeith. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 19:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, comments such as "disrespectful, bullying behaviour you've shown in bickering with and belittling others whose opinions you felt you had a moral basis for disagreeing" are unhelpful, at best, and trolling at worst. Please refrain in the future. GBT/C 20:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry - just one more thing. Users are free to remove comments from their talk page. Adding them back in when might be seen as a bit pointy. Thanks. GBT/C 20:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
It was a bit of a small bird? Or perhaps a bit snide (which for some reason redirects to Donkey Kong. Either way, the tea is here. Maybe have a biscuit with it (Hobnobs are great for dunking) then get back to me on my suggestion below. GBT/C 20:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

OK, well, I was looking for something a bit different to get my teeth into, and a dispute over a small Scottish island seems as good a place to start. Shall I offer my services as an informal mediator on the article's talk page to get this thing resolved? GBT/C 20:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)