User talk:82.110.109.210

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, dh210.public.mod.uk, is registered to Ministry of Defence (UK), and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Stale warnings

April 2006 – October 2006: 4 warnings

[edit] December 2006

Your recent edit to David Firth (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

Your recent edit to Qshoot Limited (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 14:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. -- Necrothesp 15:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Lead(II) nitrate on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Raven4x4x 09:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Necrothesp. By the way, a bet does not justify vandalism. -Mschel 18:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean bet?! Necrothesp is a bully and I intend to treat him the way he deserves. I am not so pathetic to do this for a bet.


Please do not add nonsense to another user's userpage, as you did with Necrothesp, it is considered vandalism. CopperMurdoch 10:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hot tub trev, you will be blocked from editing. Sander123 13:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Kukini, you will be blocked. Flyguy649talkcontribs 07:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 16:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] UK vs US English

I noted your edit summary here. Are you sure you are not confounding journalistic and colloquial styles? In the US, they say "We got hammered", but journalists would write "We became inebriated". Do you have in mind some examples of well-written UK articles that say "up to then end of ..." instead of "through the end of ..."?? --Otheus 10:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I did some comparisons of google counts for the phrases for the Telegraph and for the Wall Street Journal. Of course, you are not only correct, but it is quite clear that this is the case. Thanks for the education. --Otheus 11:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Barry Scott, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Soosed 07:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ryu (Street Fighter), you will be blocked from editing. Kariteh 07:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Geek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DarkFalls talk 07:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gimp. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Muchness 01:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

No. 617 Squadron RAF: Revision as of 11:07, 4 September 2007 a member of Number IX squadron I presume. Changes like this do no one in the services a favour. --Philip Baird Shearer 23:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the RAF Scampton page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. John254 01:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jenna Bush‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Rklawton (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)