User talk:82.10.209.215

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Electrosmog. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. :) Chetblong 13:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Of course it was my intention you tit. Why don't you look first, or turn off your stupid bot? Thanks :) 82.10.209.215 09:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

With regards to your comments on User talk:82.10.209.215: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Waggers 10:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Suggestion

Hello - I noticed your edits to EMF-related articles, which were brought up on the adminstrators' noticeboard. I don't disagree with the core of your assertions, nor with the need to present prevailing scientific opinion as such and minority views as minority views. However, your approach is raising some hackles. I'd suggest discussing your concerns further on the article talk pages and trying to reach some sort of consensus about how to better present the mainstream view of EMF-related health issues. Tirades, however justified they may feel, are counterproductive in the long run. Although it often doesn't feel like it, reasonableness will eventually win out here if you're able to cool off and explain your position calmly. Making rapid-fire edits to the pages in question while a controversy is unsettled on the talk page is not a good idea. If you're deeply concerned about the current version, you can tag it with {{POV}} or {{TotallyDisputed}} until the issue is resolved on the talk page - this is not ideal, but preferable to an edit war. MastCell Talk 15:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)