User talk:81.96.71.55

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising, and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox", is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.. Regards Lynbarn 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Wasting your time ...

You know, as long as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack and the beanstalk(ish) has already started, removing the tag from Jack and the beanstalk(ish) will have no effect on the outcome, since that is not how editors find out about it ... this kind of Vanispamcruftisement and self-promotion crops up all the time, but you're just too much of a nugget to realize what you are up against. :-) —72.75.70.147 (talk · contribs) 23:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits made on June 18, 2007 (UTC) to Jack and the Beanstalk

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jack and the Beanstalk, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. 72.75.70.147 23:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits made on June 20, 2007 (UTC) to Jack and the beanstalk(ish)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Jack and the beanstalk(ish). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. 72.75.70.147 21:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nottingham, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. the section you have added twice now to Nottingham is completely unsourced, and the edit summary states that it is unsourced (see WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:References for further advice about this.) It was not me who removed the edits, but I strongly advise you to add it again ONLY if you can provide a source for the statement. Otherwise you may get further warnings now from editors about disruptive editing.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Nottingham, you will be blocked from editing.  DDStretch  (talk) 08:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for our editors been impolite with you, but the verifiability is a cornerstone to the very existence of Wikipedia. In a sense Wikipedia articles are just belletristic collections of the references. Any info that is not supported by references is useless. Please spend some time and provide reliable references to you entry on Nottingam rather than edit war. It is the Wikipedia wasy to do things. Thanks Alex Bakharev 08:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)