User talk:81.151.71.146
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Based on editing habits, this user appears to be the same as 81.156.27.118 (talk • contribs • info • WHOIS) Sześćsetsześćdziesiątsześć 23:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello 81.151.71.146, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Continuity Irish Republican Army have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Amatulic 21:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Continuity Irish Republican Army. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Amatulic 21:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Continuity Irish Republican Army
A chara, chill out on the above article or else your IP will be banned, if you want ot make alteration go to the talk page to discuss. slan--Vintagekits 21:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Listen man if you revert it again you will violate WP:3RR and risk getting blocked - dont say Ididnt tell ya!--Vintagekits 21:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ooh I'm trembling...
- Cool!--Vintagekits 22:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Risteard, is Wikipedia a new theatre of war for your make-believe continuity army? I suppose the banner headline in this month's party organ - RSF: leading the struggle - compels you into action. While you might be allowed post your POV diatribe on p.ie, it won't work here. We've been through all this before.--Damac 22:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Remember WP:CIVIL please. cheers mate --Vintagekits 22:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Continuity Irish Republican Army, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Amatulic 22:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. -Amatulic 22:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits
Hi, your edits to Óglaigh na hÉireann and Continuity Irish Republican Army are no good. You can't say who or what is illegal, you can't use one-sided terminology such as "the Occupied Six Counties", you can't say who is the only true IRA etc. Such issues are disputed, please see WP:NPOV about this; the aim is neutrality. If you persist in edit warring like this, you are likely to be banned.--Rudjek 23:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -Amatulic 23:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No personal attacks
Re this edit - please read the No personal attacks policy without delay. Sześćsetsześćdziesiątsześć 23:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |