User talk:81.149.250.228

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

BUT BEAR IN MIND I HAVEN'T BEEN BLOCKED SINCE FEBRUARY AND HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG SINCE THEN AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED 81.149.250.228 (talk) 11:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

[edit] Warnings

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2007 Royal Mail industrial disputes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.Mayalld 14:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to 2007 Royal Mail industrial disputes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mayalld 14:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Headandsholderswrong.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Headandsholderswrong.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Euronext

I haven't a clue whether the information is factual or not. The point is that by adding the word "Bastards" you are pushing a POV. Your edit history seems to be rather full of such incidents, and you will just end up banned Mayalld 14:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Warring

It is unproductive to improving wikipedia to engage in edit warring. On several occasions experienced editors have reverted your changes, usually because they push a POV. Applying the change again as a knee-jerk "how dare you remove my edit" reaction is not helpful.

If you add content, you must be even handed, even if your own opinion is in favour of one side or the other. Adding content that shows marked bias, to the extent that it is openly derogatory of one POV is simply unencyclopedic, and is going to end up reverted (not necessarily by me, but somebody will revert it).

I've added the even handed sentence back into the RM industrial dispute article with a reference. It was always NPOV, now it is also sourced.

Just for reference, my own personal POV on the issue matches yours, but writing in wiki means putting my POV aside and reporting the facts as found in reliable sources. Take a look at the edit history of that article, and look where the content came from. Much of it was originally on the CWU page where it was a platant pro-CWU propaganda piece. I was the one who took the time to drag it back to a NPOV.

Mayalld 19:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Zoë Wanamaker do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 16:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Paul Neil

I've been doing a lot of editing there and haven't been stupid. Please unlock it. Thai police have just said they tracked him through traced phone calls, but I can't add it at the moment... 81.149.250.228 16:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Definitely wasn't you, it was a user with an IP starting with 194. I have unprotected the page. Neil ☎ 16:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Creating New Pages

Hi Domain of Lighting,

Although you're more than welcome to create new pages asking that editors hold off on deletion while you add more content, I should tell you that a simple request like that will not always hold. In the future, when you want to create new pages like STIR Future, may I suggest first working the article up to stub quality in your sandbox before moving it to the main article namespace? Thanks! --jonny-mt(t)(c) 05:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 11:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dont diss da counsil

or you is gonna get it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.81.88 (talk) 12:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

wot u playin at son? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Souffhampton City Council (talk • contribs) 13:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Nobel Prize in Economics, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . Also, please respect WP:CIVIL. Thank you. Should you continue this behaviour you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time. EconomicsGuy 12:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violation of WP:CIV, WP:NPA and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ronnotel 13:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Take a deep breath and start again....

So, within 3 weeks of starting to edit in Wikipedia, you have ended up with a 24 hour block. Some of the stuff that you've added was useful, but too much of it was "in your face", "my way or the highway" stuff.

Wikipedia works by establishing consensus, not by battling to force your POV until others give up, and I hope that you will return to editing having a better understanding of wiki policies, because carrying on where you left off can only lead to ever longer bans in future. Mayalld 13:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Heh. Probably need to work on signal to noise ratio a bit :P 81.149.250.228 13:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

FWIW, you seem to have a first hand knowledge of securities trading and your contributions would be greatly appreciated. You just need to learn that you can't treat people the way you would on the desk. English majors at uni won't get it and everyone will go away mad. Ronnotel 14:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Personally, Ronnotel, I wouldn't trust a fucking thing he says. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.81.88 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

<sigh!> coming from an IP address with an illustrious history of disruptive edits (both from this anon address, and from User:Souffhampton City Council (now blocked), that is a little bit rich. Personally, Ronnotel, I'd be tempted to block User:194.223.81.88 as well! Mayalld 15:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeh but dis user iz well disgrace! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.81.88 (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Trolling the talk page of a blocked user from a static ip really isn't the smartest thing to do.... EconomicsGuy 12:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm letting him (or her, I suppose) dig themselves as deep a hole as they like. 81.149.250.228 12:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Well done. Doubtless Southampton City Council will be "reminding" them about their policies. Mayalld 12:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't really describe this as trolling (except for perhaps the casual tone of the message) when one considers that this user is an obvious troll themselves, judging from their contributions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.81.88 (talk) 13:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to STIR Future

NOTE: DID NOT VANDALISE!!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to STIR Future, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 14:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pwnage

Hello Boris, check this out! Pope Abdul I 08:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

First Nicholas, then Boris... Try harder! 81.149.250.228 10:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IPPR

A link to another wiki isn't a reliable source.

[1] would be a reliable source to say that IPPR is "labour leaning", but not that it has "strong ties".

Pointing out that it has a significant numbers of Labour Party members isn't enough. Making the leap to "strong ties" is Original Research or Synthesis.

Mayalld 07:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ouroboros, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ouroboros was changed by 81.149.250.228 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-30T16:37:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 16:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

Hi, I realised that you want adopting, but i am afraid that I can only adopt you if you were to make an account. (Far top right of your page). I also see that you are a bit of a "vandal" with some of your edits and you have also been blocked! But I am hoping that I will be able to help you with this. F9T 20:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't see anything in adopt a user that forbids adopting of IPs. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 01:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, this is a static IP assigned to this computer only (which is only used by me), it's a user account in all but name! 81.149.250.228

[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dollar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jean-Claude Trichet, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jean-Claude Trichet was changed by 81.149.250.228 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-12T17:25:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jean-Claude Trichet, you will be blocked from editing. delldot talk 17:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't give a fuck. I lost a huge sum of money today.

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Brianga (talk) 08:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. delldot talk 08:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Chris 09:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tata Nano, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tata Nano was changed by 81.149.250.228 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-10T16:08:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 15 January 2008: Vandalism to Estate Agent article

Another blatant piece of vandalsim.

This person needs to be STOPPED. Viva-Verdi (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] March 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 09:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock|Ok, first of all I shouldn't have called Eliot Spitzer a wanker. Secondly, when I (hypothetically) found a user removing a comment of mine that didn't violate WP:NPA, I should have politely asked them not to do it again on their talk page. 81.149.250.228 (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Based on the above request, which shows understanding of wrong doing and contrition, I have unblocked you. Understand that based upon your history of problems, you are under a tighter scrutiny. Please take care and carefully review any edits you make before pushing the "save page" button and assure you are always civil and within bounds. Request handled by: Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo _talk 11:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London meetup tomorrow

Hi there.

You signed up for Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Would be good to see you along there. See you tomorrow! -- Harry Wood (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Year 2038 problem has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 12:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk in article

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Gambler's fallacy. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Reworded as suggested. Thanks for catching it. --McGeddon (talk) 09:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not‎, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rossami (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Negative press coverage of Dewsbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Negative press coverage of Dewsbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kevin (talk) 11:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]