User talk:81.145.241.235

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 19:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Barnoldswick on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sopoforic 04:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Sundial. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- Gilliam 17:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nina Nannar, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphim Whipp 17:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Television, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rlest 09:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Ostrum, you will be blocked from editing. Kubigula (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Avram Grant, you will be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite 18:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phylogenetics versus Linnaeus

For the record, there is an unfortunate clash between phylogenetic nomenclature, which doesn't use ranks, and the old Linnaean hierarchy, which has resulted in such problems as the old Class Aves being within the old Class Reptilia. For better or worse, Wiki has elected to use Linnaean ranks, which leads in part to the disconnect you mentioned. It's just that at the point where Aves is defined, the previous history is ignored and started back over with Class Aves in order for the Linnaean ranks to work. Thus, it is indeed inaccurate, but has been agreed upon as a compromise since Linnaean ranks are still so familiar to the public at large. Dromaeosaurids as birds and Shenzhouraptor as a dromaeosaurid are entirely different issues, and have very little support among researchers. J. Spencer 14:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — Save_Us † 17:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)