User talk:81.109.234.187

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Caledonian Sleeper

Regarding the timetable, please don't add it back in, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, see WP:NOT. This information is better provided through the links to the website. Adambro 23:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Please don't add the timetable when it should have been clearly indicated to you that this is controversial. Such edits should first be discussed on the article talk page. I would maintain that this information is much better provided through the link to the ScotRail website. Adambro 11:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Please don't shout. Please heed the advice given above and on the talk pages for the Caledonian Sleepr and Highland Chieftain pages. Don;t just add back matrial when it is removed with an explanation. If you feel strongly that the information belongs there, please explai why and obtain consensus on the respective talk pages - but Wikipedia is not the place for such material.

DrFrench 13:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking of talk pages

Don't blank talk pages just becasue you don't like the opinion. That can be considered vandalism. Repeated vandalism could end up with you being blocked. DrFrench 13:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why your reisions get undone

Why do you keep asking why your edits are gettign deleted, and then not heeding the advice given to you here?

Why did you blank this page?

If you read it, you'd understand why your edits get reverted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DrFrench (talk • contribs) 13:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

re your message

why is it if U dont agree with something that it shud b deleted? without sme1 els baking u up

If you want to make a radical change to a page, it's only polite to obtai consensus before adding it. All I am doing it reverting it to how it was before, so you can try an obtain consensus first.

You appear to be new to Wikipedia, so please read the advice above and below. It will help you understand how this place works and get more out of it. Understanding what Wikipdia is not will help you. Vandalising pages will merely get you banned. DrFrench 13:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My concern about issues of conduct

Hello, 81.109.234.187, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but after reading some of your text, I am concerned that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines might not have been properly presented to you, and that you may encounter criticism for appearing not to follow them. After you look over the documents linked above, could we discuss that concern here?

nature of concern

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance whether you were aware of these documents, what is your philosophy about interacting with other editors, and what alternative approaches you might willingly adopt that would avoid raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

  • If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
  • If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Admins usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
  • If you prefer not to deal with me at all, you can ask others for guidance: there are experienced Wikipedians who offer mentorship, "adoption", or advocacy; and many admins will also make the time to answer earnest questions on their talk pages (though some are either very busy or away on "Wikibreak").
  • Any time you feel overwhelmed by the complexity of it all, you can simply post {{helpme}} here on your talk page, with a description of your questions or problems, and someone will show up to help you find answers or solutions.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your conduct is so bad as to get reported straight to administrator noticeboards or get you summarily blocked. I hope matters will never become that severe. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again! -- DrFrench 13:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Hopefully you have also noted my comments regarding the three revert rule on the talk page DrFrench. Edit warring is not constructive and could result in blocks from editing if this continues. Adambro 13:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, can you please sign any comments you make on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks for your help. Adambro 13:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Timetables.

This is a cross-post. Due to your Edit waring over Highland Chieftain and Caldeonian Sleeper, you've violated 3RR, therefore I've reverted to a pre-edit-war version and reported you both on the 3RR noticeboard. Please refrain from editing the articles until the matter has been settled. Thanks, Will (Speak to Me/Breathe)(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash) 13:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

, for 24 hrs Rlevse 15:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Caledonian Sleeper. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Rambling Man 17:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Caledonian Sleeper. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Flyguy649talkcontribs 17:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Caledonian Sleeper, you will be blocked from editing. Richard Thompson 17:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

<<unblock|i didnt see the warnings and it was an accident>>

You haven't been blocked. That was a final warning. Next time you do vandalize a page, you will be blocked, so I recommend making better edits. Chickyfuzz14(user talk) 17:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I HAVE been blocked i cannot edit any other pages than this --81.109.234.187 17:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Naconkantari has blockd me for vandalism it was an accident and i cant leave a message on his page --81.109.234.187 17:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Block log shows block. And seriously, you have a history of blanking the Caledonian Sleeper page and talk page. Please be very careful. I'll leave a note there for you. Flyguy649talkcontribs 17:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i didnt see the warnings and it was an accident pleas unblock me i will be mor carwful in future"

Decline reason: "You are only blocked for 31 hours and will not be unblocked before then. Please do not repeat your disruptive behaivour or you may find yourself blocked for longer than 31 hours next time. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Comment - you have a history of vandalising this article, and edit summaries show "blanking the page". How can it be an accident to do this three times? M0RHI | Talk to me 17:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

because i press wrong button and computer work stopped --81.109.234.187 18:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

vandalism

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla 20:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)