User talk:81.0.182.35

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cowboy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 12:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Real Madrid C.F., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Real Madrid C.F. was changed by 81.0.182.35 (c) (t) score equals -261327 on 2008-01-11T10:06:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George Best, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George Best was changed by 81.0.182.35 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-22T11:34:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to George Best constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks Cometstyles 11:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC))

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Wedding Planner has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dureo (talk) 08:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to People en Español constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Dureo (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Dalbury. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Dureo (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rowan Atkinson. Dureo (talk) 08:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edvard Munch, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Edvard Munch was changed by 81.0.182.35 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-07T10:49:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Edvard Munch (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ixfd64 (talk) 10:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to John Steinbeck has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 11:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bridge, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SMC (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bridge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SMC (talk) 12:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Naomi Russell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma msg! 09:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to Koala (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Koala, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Koala was changed by 81.0.182.35 (u) (t) deleting 21896 characters on 2008-04-29T11:03:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Negro. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tresiden (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Stasi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Hobartimus (talk) 11:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)