User talk:80.5.160.8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 80.5.160.8, is registered to bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Edward 11:08, 2005 May 30 (UTC)

don't vandalize wikipedia. RickK 23:43, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  – Jrdioko (Talk) 22:34, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This edit is considered vandalism.  – Jrdioko (Talk) 22:41, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Don't create articles with no content. Academic Challenger 01:35, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Repeated and consistent vandalising of Ecademy. jbond 13:03, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing the Introduction article. See Introduction diff. Replacing the text marked {{Please leave this line alone}} <!--Feel free to edit the text below this line. No profanity, please.--> with potentially libeleous material about someone is something that can get you blocked. Trödel|talk 23:15, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Thanks for cleaning the spam

I noticed you did the revert by hand. Next time, you could do as described at Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version. It's faster and reduces the chances for error (you left two extra blank lines this time, for instance).

cesarb 02:15, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Test

Hi. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please note that wikipedia has a sandbox which was made for these types of tests. It would be appreciated if you perform all tests there in the future. If you have any further questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page. -Frazzydee|✍ 18:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress

You have been reported to Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress. P Ingerson 23:09, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Appropriate article content

Please read WP:NOT. Firebug 01:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --W(t) 16:37, 2005 May 15 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Infrogmation 13:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-automated template substitution

[edit] AfD nomination of Cannabis Assembly

An editor has nominated Cannabis Assembly, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannabis Assembly and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)