User talk:80.3.128.5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. CryptoDerk 15:29, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

What page does this chastisement relate to? I have had the lease on this IP address for a while, but I can't remember ever editing Wikipedia from it. However, there are four other users on it. If you're going to address comments to users who are identified by their IP address rather than their account, please be a bit more specific about what you are talking about. A specific article in which the transgression occurred would be a start! Thanks, the Anonymous current owner of 80.3.128.5

That would relate to all today's edits except the one above - mostly Premier League clubs like Liverpool F.C.. All these links point to wagertowin.co.uk. If it's not you, and you can reach those other users, please tell the one responsible that this is not a good thing to do. If the one responsible reads this: Please stop. -- grm_wnr Esc 16:15, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Of course, if you were to create an account, it would solve all these problems... Alphax τεχ 16:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Chris Bowater

An editor has nominated Chris Bowater, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Bowater and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)