User talk:80.195.226.94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wafulz 03:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wafulz 03:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Would you describe yourself as being obsessed with race ?

I have posted mainly about the Jewish/English confusion.

Are the Jews and English of different race? If not your question makes no sense.

Your question implies that you assume these questions are important to Jews and English or people of different 'races' and that these are 'racial' issues.

I think you lie - Scots are not Welsh - and demanding clarity on definition is not racist.

What do you mean by race?

[edit] English vs British

Why are you going through articles and changing "English" to "British"? Technically, the people born in England are English. --Wafulz 05:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Use Wiki if you don't know the difference.

"A Briton is often referred to in broad terms as being an inhabitant of the geographical region of Great Britain or British citizen." vs. "The English are an ethnic group or nation primarily associated with England and the English language." As far as I see it, what you're doing is wrong because the people are actually specifically English (as opposed to generally British), particularly since most of them were born in London too. --Wafulz 03:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to English people. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wafulz 03:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

The content I removed from 'the English people' did not concern the English people, (!) that's why it was removed. The religious beliefs of non-English people living in England are covered on another, appropriate page - 'Religion in the United Kingdom'.

Please use edit summaries. If you just inexplicably removed a chunk of relevant text, it will get reverted. --Wafulz 17:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Roman Greenberg

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Roman Greenberg are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --Muchness 10:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] English - Jewish references

Hello! If you are going to change this sort of fact, can you please discuss your plans beforehand on the relevant article's Talk page and provide references to support your proposal? To not do so makes the change appear arbitrary. Regards, (aeropagitica) 06:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for your repeated edit warring on Rachel Weisz, but your entire history of editing to make sure that English people are not classed as Jewish, or vice versa, is bordering on anti-Semitism, and I suggest you begin discussing your edits, or your block time will be extended. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

That's ridiculous! My intention is to clearly to respect both Englishness and Jewishness. The people who insist on an English ethnic identity for Jews are denying ethnic identity altogether to the English people. (No antisemitism from me - but undeniable anti-Englishness from others, including you).

Your intention is to denigrate Jewishness by trying to claim that Jews can't be English, which is absurd. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
After being unblocked, please read WP:MOSBIO before continuing with your edits. --PhantomS 02:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Zoe, your implied opening-up of Englishness to all peoples makes the particular Englishmen extinct. You are comitting ethnocide. The 'denigration' is a one-way street - I allow all other nations to exist... I just don't want mine, alone, denied an identity.

[edit] Your continued crusade

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Vanessa Feltz, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

It is someone else'e erroneous POV that VF is English. It is a FACT that she is not.

Really? Can you cite a reliable source for that? If you can't its just your point of view. The sad truth is you don't seem to believe that anyone who comes from a Jewish background can also be of English nationality. This sort of petty-minded Little Britain racism isn't welcome on Wikipedia. The English are a mongrel race and it simply isn't true that one cannot be both Jewish and English at the same time. Gwernol 03:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for continued WP:POV pushing

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly violating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased contributions, feel free to do so after the block expires. Gwernol 02:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

To understand what you mean please post more than 'INITIALS' which even clicking their links gives no clue.

I posted no P.O.V. about Feltz. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.195.226.94 (talk • contribs).

Wikipedia has a policy that articles must maintain a neutral point of view. Your insistence on changing valid information to push your own particular [{WP:POV|point of view]] (that people cannot be described as "English", that if one has Jewish parents, one cannot be English, that Paul McCartney is not English, that Stephen Fry is not English, that Vanessa Feltz is not English etc.) is not allowed. You have been warned time and again about this yet persist. Please stop. If you wish to make these kinds of changes, you must cite a verifiable and independent source that confirms the change you wish to make. Gwernol 02:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I do not believe you are responding to my more recent posts where I have said mixed-ethnicity celebs are of ... er... mixed ethnicity. If Vanessa Feltz is English the whole of the 'English People' page at Wiki at can be zapped.

.... Do it if you're right!