User talk:80.176.254.66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to The French

Your recent edit to The French (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Kangaroo, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Terence Ong (C | R) 11:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Bully (video game) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bully (video game), you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 12:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

[edit] October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Benito Mussolini, you will be blocked from editing. Onorem♠Dil 15:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barcodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris  G  09:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jodie Foster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 12:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to James I of England has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 16:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Oliver Cromwell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 10:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James I of England. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FusionMix 13:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Box Hill, Surrey. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ilyushka88 (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Copito de Nieve‎, you will be blocked from editing. --CyberGhostface (talk) 16:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hindu temple has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tresiden (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Ballet constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tresiden (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Hindu temple (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 09:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)