User talk:80.176.250.209

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please try and keep a cool head, despite comments people may make against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments will only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try and be civil. Thanks! (CJ) Computerjoe 18:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ian McKellen, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. EliminatorJR Talk 00:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Ian McKellen, you will be blocked from editing. Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 00:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Billy227 i was at the RSC last night, the 24th of May, watching the evening performance of Shakespeare's 'King Lear'. Act 3 Scene 4, i think you will find, involves Lear in his madness removing his trousers and underwear. Perhaps you are not familiar with the text. Ian McKellen in the title role had the scene no differently, and he too displayed to an audience of 400-500, i am not sure how many the Courtyard Theatre seats, his penis - which is very big. This is a fact and rightly of place in the 'miscellaneous' section of the page concerning said actor. Vandalism it is not, merely information. So, if you don't mind, i may put it back seeing as wikipedia defines vandalism 'any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.' I do not think the addition of this fact is in any way threatening or compromising the integrity of wikipedia. It is very good of you to be concerned with wikipedia vandalism, and it is appreciated where necessary. In this instance, however, i think you are mistaken. Mr.Jones.