From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I would like this block to be repealed because I feel the blocking is wholly unfair. Please see the following examples:
Privyet
Kak dilla? What do you mean exactly by trolling?
kop koon krap.
Sammy.
- was reverted for vandalism when i was asking a genuine question. I noticed that the editor spoke some russian and thai so I was also trying to be nice.
afterwards i wrote:
OMG what is wrong with this place? I can't even ask a simple question without getting my edits reverted. ARGH!!! The admin who reverted that needs to read up his rule book again I think.
some consider this vandalism too apparently.
then I wrote on the admin in questions page:
Hi
Why exactly did you revert my previous comment please? I'm not saying this goes for you, but sometimes I think the power goes to admin's heads a bit sometimes.
and then, as if to prove my point exactly, i was blocked for 24 hours :(
maybe WP should block User:ESkog and User:Barneca for 24hours and see how they like it, perhaps afterwards they might not be so trigger happy with their block bottons."
Decline reason: "I don't see a single positive edit to a single encyclopaedia article listed either Special:Contributions/79.69.175.62 or Special:Contributions/79.69.206.164. Therefore there are no grounds to lift your block before it expires since there doesn't seem to be any truth whatsoever to your claim that you need to edit Wikipedia for a school project. -- Netsnipe ► 18:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
[edit] Note for reviewing admin
For more background, this is the same user here, who received the full 4-level treatment. They then switched to this IP to make this exchange with me: [1]. When they pushed the boundaries to see if I meant it, I blocked. --barneca (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually you're wrong, this: here has nothing to do with me. I wrote to you asking about why you blocked my IP 3 days ago. I believe that I was blocked because I didn't speak to you with the respect that you believe if your god given right now that you are an admin. Anyway, I doesn't change my opinion that User:ESkog and User:Barneca are bad admins, and their positions should be seriously questioned IMHO.
- This page has been protected for the duration of your block to prevent further personal attacks. --Yamla (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|
