User talk:79.67.229.108
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] First-order logic
Please don't insert strange claims into articles as you did in First-order logic. Gardeners are not frequent users of first-order logic. Although you may have been trying to be humorous, or trying to test the editing system, your edits to that article don't contribute towards a professional encyclopedia. — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Why was this update reverted? The beauty of wikipedia is that it can be at the cutting edge of new developments. You've obviously not seen the news recently, gardeners in Scotland have been conducting trials since 1989 about the logical patterns behind planting trees, and other assorted plants. They represent their findings using first order logic, because propositional logic does not easily allow for the domain (that is, the particular area of planting), to be taken into account. A simple search on google should confirm this if you are still unsatisfied, in the meantime I will be reverting to my edit of the article. Thanks.
- A quick google search doesn't show a reference to Scottish gardeners. If you feel it is noteworthy enough to include in the article, please bring it up on the talk page of the article rather than just reverting. Since you want to include this information, you will need to provide a convincing argument that it should be there. In the meantime, please discontinue reverting - you will only end up violating the three revert rule, but you won't be able to force content into the article without getting agreement for it. — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
On the whole, gardeners don't apply first-order logic to what they do. If one group claims a connection, that's still not important enough to add them to the lede - but you have yet to provide a reference to that. Please stop adding the claim to the article until you can find agreement for it to stay. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User page vandalism
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Penwhale. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Accurizer 11:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Test edits
You seem to be making several "test edits" to various user pages. The place for testing is Wikipedia:Sandbox. In particular, you shouldn't place warning messages on talk pages unless the warning is actually warranted, and you shouldn't edit user pages of other users. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Racism, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Racism was changed by 79.67.229.108 (c) (t) replacing content with 'FUCKING NIGGERS' on 2007-08-21T11:47:47+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 15:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Racism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Orange Mike 15:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Nuttycoconut 16:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. utcursch | talk 16:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |