User talk:76.97.163.77

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please clearly explain the POV that you are objecting to in Ann Catherine's page, on the talk page before just editing and deleting. The article in question is about a Cathoolic person already decalared as Blessed, and hence relates to religion. It is not an article on chemistry or solid state physics, hence needs to mention that she did not write the words in that book - a fact that was previously ignored in that section.

Thank you.


  • Actually that fact was already mentioned in that article a few paragraphs further up, so I did not think I needed a reference to something that already appeared in Wikipedia. It was not really original research, but a clarification of facts already there. In many cases, just stating facts that are in Wikipedia but not in an obvious way, can clarify various things. History2007 05:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I looked at your changes. Now why do we even need those paragraphs with the weasel words? They were not originally written by me and I see no benefit from them. I did try to balance them before, but I think the fact is that true balance is probably half way between your mindset and mine. In any case, I suggest deleting those items instead of keeping them as weaseled because they just look incomplete. Furthermore, your statement that the Vatican dispensed with the book, etc. has the POV stamp on its tone and wording in a way that it can be felt a mile away. At least tone it down a little bit my friend. Next question: why don't you have a username (it is free) so your IP will not get confused with others? —Preceding unsigned comment added by History2007 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Your recent edit to Antisemitism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alton H. Maddox, Jr.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Animum (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

So ClueBot is a piece of shit, is it? What a worthy contribution to this project you've made with that phrase. I'm sure its author will make good use of it in the ongoing effort at improvement. 130.156.30.182 (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Talk page guidelines state, that archiving is preferred to deletion and removing comments without any reason is generally regarded as uncivil. Please edit more responsibly in the future 130.156.29.112 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)