User talk:76.71.209.167

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Mouse (computing)

I had to revert your addition, as it broke the sense of the section and the cite was a broken link so I couldn't even see what the claim was based on. Plus it didn't make a lot of sense. If you're going to claim a conclusion like "is widely claimed" then you need a source that says it's widely claimed; it's much easier to support a simple claim than a claim of widely claimed. And if you add a paragraph, use normal wiki formatting (blank line between paragraphs, not html br tags) and make sure you don't break the sense of the paragraph that follows. Dicklyon (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)