User talk:76.24.143.153

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a dangerous cult. I have no personal conflict of intrests, aside from a distaste for mental manipulation of disenfranchised youth.

To compare, House of yahweh is a somewhat less dangerous cult, yet information about how messed up they are was placed by providing neutral, researched and properly cited information within the article, within the policies of wikipedia. I'm just saying, once the block is over, you would be better served to step back, work within the system, properly update the article(s) and find a way to convey the truth (not your truth per se, but neutral, true information) into the article, a little at a time. Getting pissed and trying to force everyone into seeing things your way will only resort to you getting blocked, and NO new information getting put into the article. If what you are claiming is true, then surely there are newspaper articles that raise questions and would be proper citations. Personally, I have no idea, I just know you got blocked (rightly, I might add) and you weren't actually trying to do something bad. I am trying to help you. If you come back and just try to force others to accept your changes, I will be the first to report it, however. We all play by the same rules. Pharmboy (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your constructive critisism.

My attempts to legitimately improve the site were thwarted by cult memebers who have a detailed knowledge of wikipedia.

As you clearly know what you are doing - I beg of you, please make sure the danger is known.

This is too important.

No, your attempts were thwarted by people just like me. If they had not blocked you, I would have requested the same. You are taking this personal, and it isn't. Every single article I edit, I must provide citations to demonstrate that my claims can be verified. The same is expected for you. I am just an editor, just like you are an editor. Think about it, if there were no rules about editing, this place would be a mess. There isn't a conspiracy against you, believe me. You just have to calm down and follow the same rules we all do. I didn't learn them overnight either. Again, I fully support the fact that they blocked you. 100%. I am also sensitive to the fact that you were not trying to vandalise anything, you just don't understand how things work here. If you goal is to truly provide factual information, then you will be able to *if* you read the policies about editing a bit, and step back enough to be a bit more objective. Here are some links you might want to read while you are blocked from editing, in this welcome section

Welcome!

Hello, 76.24.143.153, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Now, if you don't want to learn a little about the policies, and try to work within the guidelines and rules here, expect to be blocked continuously. As you can tell, enough people watch articles like myself that we catch on pretty fast. By the way, we all do this for free, because we believe in what Wikipedia stands for. This is why others get upset, because when you get rude and don't follow the rules, and tell them "no", well, you violate Wikipedia itself and what we believe in. So go read, chill out, slow down. Otherwise I will have to be the one on this end asking for a block next time. Pharmboy (talk) 01:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Zendik Farm, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Versageek 23:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zendik Farm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SimpleParadox 23:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You would be better off if you made constructive edits that contained the information you are wanting to put in the article, rather than simply break the rules here, and end up getting blocked, which you are about 30 seconds away from. Pharmboy (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for If you can provide proper references from reliable sources which highlight the 'cult like aspects' of the Zendik group, I will assist you in adding a paragraph about it, but you really must stop replacing the entire article with a large accusation.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Versageek 23:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.