User talk:76.212.158.1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Tendentious editing

As is evident by the continual reference to disputed and unverified commentary repeated countless times, now with the campaigning on other editor's talk pages and continued assertions of “suppressing information,” “censorship” or “denying facts,” the "666" incident represents Tendentious editing. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 14:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC).

There is no campaigning going on, Mr. Bzuk. Please stop accusing me of things that aren't happening or I'll start thinking you are deliberately attempting to stop me from speaking to other editors entirely. That isn't the case, is it? And the commentary isn't unverified, you cite it yourself in your block request. You made the satanical analogy, not I. Please don't blame me for things I haven't done.
Now, I haven't posted on the movie's Discussion page nor on your page. Where do my posts involve you? They don't, you weren't mentioned other than in my block response, and that's not inappropriate.
Please stop harassing me, Mr. Bzuk. It's becoming apparent to other parties that you have ulterior motives in this issue. And you'll notice I haven't deleted your post.--76.212.157.7 (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)