User talk:76.203.126.249

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] re:Funambol

Sorry about the late reply, I did not notice the message. Please put further messages at the bottom of my talk page. If you put it at the top, it tends to get lost in the string of messages that follows. Anyways.

Why should open source products be treated differently? Just because they are not being sold for money they cannot be advertised or be promoted? Thats definitely not the case. Anyways, the article was mainly deleted because of the marketing phrases that it uses, like "he Funambol project has gone beyond the original server engine, and now includes administration tools and client-side APIs"; this makes the article non-neutral and thus not suitable here.

Anyways, I am restoring the article and listing for deletion discussion. Please update the article to remove self-vaunting words and present capabilities, awards and distinguishing features in a neutral ways. I will reevaluate the nomination (or withdraw) based on the changes. --soum talk 06:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)