User talk:76.16.151.77

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Template:Space Shuttles on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mike Peel 21:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Space Shuttles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Cjosefy 12:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Template:Space Shuttles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cjosefy 17:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ivvan Cain 16:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Notice

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Space Shuttle Explorer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Storkk 13:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Space Shuttle Explorer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Storkk 13:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense. Orbiter Vehicle Designation clearly states that OV-100 is impossible. Also, it is not named after "unknown"... It's not named after anybody. Therefore the field should be left blank. --Storkk 13:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Addition of Image:TIME feb 2003.jpg to Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster

This image was removed, per discussion on the talk page, because it was copyrighted, and an alternative image was available in the public domain. Please do not re-insert it. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Concorde. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Gwernol 18:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Space Shuttle, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 18:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Space Shuttle Explorer. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Space Shuttle Pathfinder. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Space Shuttle Explorer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Space Shuttle Orbiter, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Space Shuttle Explorer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. If you are trying to make legitimate edits, please discuss on the article talk page as numerous editors are disagreeing with you. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Long-term disruption (possibly vandalism)

  • Blocking admin: not provided.
  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page.

[edit] October 9

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to STS-3, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- DiegoTehMexican 21:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unnecessary wikilinking

Thank you for experimenting with wikipedia. However, please stop wikilinking common terms and terms already wikilinked before in articles.

Also, Space Shuttle America is a ride so it would not need the Space Shuttles infobox.

Ivvan Cain 15:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Stop pointless wikilinking common terms. The colors are general COMMON terms. Stop wikilinking all the colors. Stop breaking apart wikilinks like "Beach House" into Beach and House. Seperately, the article for Beach and the article for House does not add to explain a Beach House. And stop wikilinking Blood Red. It's a common term to people who regularly use the English language. This is the third time you've wikilinked blood red in the Grim Tales from Down Below. I'm glad you are trying to add to wikipedia put quit wikilinking common terms. It doesn't help and just makes the articles look link happy.
Ivvan Cain 17:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Space Shuttle Challenger disaster

Hi. I like the "from Cocoa Beach" picture that you've added to the article on the Challenger disaster. However, there are already a lot of pictures in the article, and it doesn't seem to be quite as clear an illustration as the "SRB plume" picture that's above it. If you have a reason for feeling that this is an important picture, let me know, but otherwise I think I'm going to remove it. MLilburne 07:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disruptive

I have asked you to stop over linking before. This is the fifth time you've decided to overlink Grim Tales from Down Below. If you really feel it's neccessary to link the colors and words that bare little importance in the content, use the discussion paper and explain your reasoning. Just because there's a wikipedia article for a word does NOT mean it has to be linked to every time the word is used. Wikipedia is a group effort and discussion is neccessary in times of disputes. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Ivvan Cain 17:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quotes sections

Please do not add quotes to wikipedia articles. If the quotes come from television shows they are in all liklyhood copyright violations. Quotes belong on our sister project Wikiquote. Cheers. L0b0t 17:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Again, please stop adding quotes to articles. Quotes belong on our sister project Wikiquote. Cheers. L0b0t 04:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 25 and 2000

I have to remove Image:Concordefire01.jpg from July 25 and 2000. The image is copyrighted, and we can only claim fair use in the Air France Flight 4590 article. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of colors

Your contributions to "List of colors" only seemed to negatively affect the article. Special:Contributions/76.16.151.77 Zephyr103 01:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: I'm sorry. I just thought that the cinnamon color block and the chocolate color block were in the wrong place. I didn't know that change would end up with a negative effect.

[edit] Don't forget to sign your posts

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Okay, I'll try to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.151.77 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Space shuttle disintegration image

Please don't place images in the flow of the summary pages for 1 February or 2003; they break the flow. The image is much more sensibly placed on the Space Shuttle Columbia, if it is to be placed anywhere. Geoff Riley 18:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright infringement

Please also respect copyright, as this CNN image can only be used under fair use provisions, which prevents its use in articles about years or dates. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop violating copyright as you did at February 1. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. Please familiarise yourself with our policies on non-free images. Further copyright infringements may result in your being blocked from editing. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked for repeatedly infringing copyright despite warnings. Please take the time to read up on our policies on copyright and the use of non-free images. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)