User talk:75.73.188.53

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

--Richard 07:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Cold War. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Krellis 01:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] Regarding edits made during February 17, 2007

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during February 17, 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during March 20, 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Wikipedia, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Quixtar. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Knverma 08:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


[edit] June 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Dateline NBC. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. Knverma 19:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Dateline NBC. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Knverma 22:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Quixtar, you will be blocked from editing.

  • Regarding your edits about success and people beliefs about partner stores: Wikipedia is not for personal opinions or original research.
  • The material about small businesses is not directly related to Quixtar and should not be in that article. --Knverma 23:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Quixtar, you will be blocked from editing. Knverma 03:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Multi-level marketing, you will be blocked from editing. Knverma 03:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Húsönd 03:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during June 13, 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 04:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


There is no advertising link added by me. What is the use of Wiki if the websites created by corporation about which the page is, are also not allowed to be on the page.

At the same time, I see a lot of blogs and other irrelevant sites listed on the page.

e.g. www.thisbiznow.com and www.ibofacts.com are valid websites. Moreover I see a lot of links related to Dateline and other blogs still listed on this page even though Wiki guidelines suggest not to put blogs.

Thisbiznow is a corporate spam site with no reason to be linked. Dateline's not a blog. Please stop adding links if you don't understand our policies about external links. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

But Dateline has its own page to have information about that site. Of course that link is here because they had some news about Quixtar, I guess. But what is wrong with quixtar's own site. Why do you want to hide it from the people. Even if it exposes some facts you dont want to, I trust Wiki should be a neutral place. 75.73.188.53 06:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on June 13, 2007 to Quixtar

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning, but aviod making any reverts within 24 hours of this warning in order to avoid any confusion. (ESkog)(Talk) 04:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

As you have continued reverting this article, you have been blocked for violations of the three-revert rule. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was trying to cleanup the mess created by vandal Knverma. I am yet to learn how to warn people trying to remove contents or trying to disrupt an article. Hence I reverted the disruptions without giving adequate warning to user Knverma"

Decline reason: "3RR exists for a reason. Please review it after your block expires, and be careful in the future. — Jmlk17 08:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Posting of warnings

Please do not post warnings to users that have not broken the rules - as you did here. ChrischTalk 06:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The previous comment " Are you having fun? See you after block expires" looks like a personal attack. Isn't it?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.188.53 (talk • contribs) on June 16

I do not believe that it is a personal attack. The user has simply pointed out that your abuse has resulted in a block, and that they don't want to hear from you until your block has expired - which is not a personal attack. Just like if I were to say "if you don't vandalise Wikipedia, you won't be blocked for it". Touché.

ChrischTalk 06:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

and what should I do about Eskog who is deleting information from [Quixtar] and then posting warning on my page? I am not reverting his deletions to avoid 3RR block. Please help

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.188.53 (talk • contribs) on June 16

The answer to that is "nothing". Your edits are written like advertisements, and adding those links is, in some ways, considered spam. As suggested by ESkog, please read Wikipedia:External links very carefully before re-adding any more links.

Also, please sign your posts, because I'm tired of adding the unsigned template every time you ask a question :p You can sign them by clicking the signature button at the top of the edit box (about half way along), or by adding ~~~~ to the end of your posts.

ChrischTalk 06:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for educating me about the signature. What advertisement are we talking about? The site removed by Eskog was a statistics page, not an advertisement. The site deleted was http://www.thisbiznow.com/quixtar/statistics.html --75.73.188.53 06:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: External links at Quixtar

I've got them. Thanks for the heads-up. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Quixtar, you will be blocked from editing. Sir James Paul 06:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You also took out revelant links.--Sir James Paul 06:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

So are you blocking us both? It will be nice if you can please review who removed blogs and who removed valid info.

i'm sorry i jumped the gun with the reversion, that's the pain of patrolling the new changes list. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 03:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Request you to please cleanup the mess which some desperate critics have created on that page.

75.73.188.53 04:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] corporate sites

Stop making the Quixtar article into a link farm. These pages are not about promoting a particular company. We do not need six external links especially when the ones I removed are all cited in the text. Take this to the talk page and stop revert warring. Such aggressive editing in the long term usually ends up with the aggressive editors comments being given less weight.David D. (Talk) 16:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Do not delete information unilaterally without discussing. Wiklipedia has a purpose. It is not for keeping things of your like. 75.73.188.53 16:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
It was not clear from my edit summary? It has been discussed before, if you look through the archives. David D. (Talk) 08:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Quixtar. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss 16:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I was trying to cut & paste and saved by mistake. I was about to revert it myself but you did it immediately. Thanks. 75.73.188.53 16:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
By the way David D. also deleted some links intentionally. Would you have reverted them if I had not? 75.73.188.53 16:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Multi-level marketing

I deleted the following material:

  • The MLM model does not guarantee the success of any individual involved in this model. The success will depend primarily on amount of work done by the individual like any other business model and is not a good model for persons who bare not willing to work hard and expect results.

because it is unsourced, and actually says nothing factual. It is like saying if you don't work then you won't achieve anything. Such things can be said in any article. If you have any more precise statements (statistics etc) from some source, it could be added to the article. --Knverma 13:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

What is the guarantee that you will not delete the statistics also as you did at Quixtar The site deleted was http://www.thisbiznow.com/quixtar/ibo_statistics.html 75.73.188.53 04:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

What's your point, there is no guarantee about any user. --Knverma 07:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
If you object to any of my past deletions, you can show the precise diff and I'll be glad to discuss. Some of the topics we are already discussing on Talk:Quixtar. --Knverma 14:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, if you look at history tab on Quixtar you or anyone else can see how much official statistics you have deleted there 75.73.188.53 15:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Will try to find. --Knverma 18:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Where are the diffs for this assertion? They should be easy to find. David D. (Talk) 08:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR at Quixtar

Please be careful not to violate the three-revert rule again. Talk more, revert less - I'll try to do the same. (ESkog)(Talk) 04:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Irony

Can you still edit Quixtar now that it is semi protected? If not, that would be a bit ironic, why don't you just register and get a user name? You seem to be a dedicated editor and the advantages are that other editors will not see you as a fly-by contributor and are more likely to view your edits in good faith. IP edits always get less respect because so often they are vandalism or POV pushing. Also you won't have problems with semi protection in the future. Another irony is that having a user name is more anonymous than letting everyone know your IP address. David D. (Talk) 15:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Multi-level marketing

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Multi-level marketing. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. You know full well that those links are not spam. Argyriou (talk) 19:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

And what are constructive edits? I was just trying to improve the article 75.73.188.53 06:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quixtar

Stop removing sources from the article. This is getting old. David D. (Talk) 07:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Quixtar, you will be blocked from editing. (just a followup for when we get an admin to block you) Argyriou (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Sources or Blogs? 75.73.188.53 06:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)