User talk:75.73.160.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Ronald Reagan Featured Article Candidate

Hi. I see that you left a comment on Ronald Reagan's featured article candidacy page. I want to thank you, and let you know that I totally agree with you. When you started writing it, you listed it as a "Comment". From what you said, it sounded like you support it. I was going to request your permission to switch it from "Comment" to "Support." ( You can find the page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Ronald_Reagan&redirect=no ). It only helps us in getting it closer to Featured Article Status. Again, thank you for your comments, and if you don't want it to be "Support," please tell me. Thanks, Happyme22 17:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I also noticed that you wrote a nice little paragraph on my title page, which I kept there. I want to thank you for it. It meant a lot to me, knowing that my edits were that good. Again, thank you! Happyme22 19:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. I read what you said on Ronald Reagan's Featured Article Page. I was wondering if after you wrote what you said, if you could pease sign your username using four tildes, that would be great. That way, we know who wrote the kind things about Reagan. When you sign your name with four tildes, your username will take it's place auotmatically. If you don't mind, go back to the Reagan FAC page, click edit, and just typr four tildes after what you said. Thanks, Happyme22 16:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ronald Reagan Lead

Hi again. I noticed that you deleted some things from the intro. of Ronald Reagan's article, added some of your own. While I agree with everything that you wrote, there were some problems with it, such as POV (see: Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Ronald_Reagan/archive3), and it was one of the reasons that Reagan's article failed in the FAC nomination. Also, when you read what the Wikipedia Manual Of Style has to say about Leads (WP:LEAD), you will notice that it says to mention a phrase or senetence from every heading in it. With what was there, that's what it did; with what you added, it concentrates more on foreign policy (The Cold War). I think, just for the sake of everyone, it might be better to go with what was there. I will integrate some of what you wrote into it, however. Thanks, and feel free to keep on editing! -- Happyme22 03:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reagan Lead

Sorry if I caused any conroversy. I'm glad we were able to compromise Happyme22 04:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)