User talk:75.69.230.146

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Successful AFC

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Hiroyuki Ebihara was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account. Thank you.--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 15:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Warning

There are warnings for calling me a "Dumbass" And here it is.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did to User: Angry Sun when you reverted a edit on the King Bowser Article. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Angry Sun 02:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Second Warning

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Angry Sun 02:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] First Vandalism Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to King Bowser, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Angry Sun 02:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Third Attacking Warning

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Angry Sun 02:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Cheers, JetLover 02:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cheers, JetLover 03:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

um what? there were no more attacks made by me after the 3rd warning. it was Angry Sun who subsequently called ME a fool,75.69.230.146
Which isn't a attack.
Calling me a dumbass is.
Here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cankers—Preceding unsigned comment added by Angry Sun (talk • contribs)
you are insulting me! of course that's an attack!75.69.230.146 03:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, you called him a fucking dumbass first. Cheers, JetLover 03:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
yes but that's what the first 3 warnings from him were for. I was asking what precipitated the 4th from you75.69.230.146 03:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh, nevermind. But you gotta stop this edit warring. It's against the rules and you can be blocked for it. Cheers, JetLover 03:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
then how come you have not said anything on Angry Sun's talk page? doesn't it take two parties to go to war?75.69.230.146 03:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
The thing is, you're the one who struck first by editing the page. Cheers, JetLover 03:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
that is ridiculous. I reverted a lot of bad edits( leaving some good ones, btw) and he reverted my whole reversion in order to restore a single previous edit. if we both kept reverting why would I be the only one violating the rule?75.69.230.146
You started it. Why don';t you try to debate this on the article's talk page? Cheers, JetLover 03:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I looked at the rule, don't think that's how it works. both parties are guilty. and I disagree about who started it.75.69.230.146

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Wikipedia. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Deleting a good ref. Warning time. And you did start it with Bowser. Angry Sun 03:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Touche. Cheers, JetLover 03:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures

Look here genius. Every picture on Wikipedia? Came from a Fansite. Lemmy Koopa's Art came from a Fan-Site. Ludwig's came from a Fan-Site. Mario's? Well that is probably official...but regardless.

The reason they are up there is because they are a source as to what that section is talking about. Under these "rules" The image is allowed to stay for Explanational purposes. That piece of the article needed proof and proof was given. It doesn't matter if it came from a Fan-site or not. Only info from a Fan-site is not a Reliable Source. Images on the other hand are not the same. And if that doesn't do it for you ask Antandrus He's admin. He can tell you all about Wiki. Angry Sun 06:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

sarcastic use of "genius"? another personal attack. fucking hypocrite. anyway I don't have to ask an admin, it's not in the rules so it's not official. those other pictures are not linked on the fansites, they are images uploaded to wikipedia, citing the games as sources and with fair use rationale etc.75.69.230.146 07:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Not all of them.
The refs are sometimes images.
That aren't uploaded at all to Wiki.
You need to understand what "personal attack" means... Angry Sun 07:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
then they're all invalid, and if I happen across them, I'll remove them too.
no, YOU need to understand what a personal attack is.75.69.230.146 07:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images Angry Sun 18:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

the Image policy is about uploaded images on Wikipedia and related projects, NOT about using images as citations, especially FANSITE images. also, there's this thing called a wikilink75.69.230.146 18:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Images
You lose. Angry Sun 18:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
did you even READ what you just linked? it talked about the "image description page" meaning it is CLEARLY referring to uploaded images75.69.230.146 18:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ss_ss6.gif There. Angry Sun 18:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Koopaling

Hi 75.69.230.146, please consider not editing the Koopaling article for a bit. The 3RR rule has been violated by both of you, and I think you don't want to be blocked. The best way is to take part in the discussion on the talk page. And don't forget about WikiLove – it brings more results than WikiHate :) Thanks, Andrij Kursetsky ⊗ 17:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)



Also Bowser Sr. would be Bowser's Dad... Who the fans call Morton Koopa Sr... Don't get them mixed up next time... Angry Sun 03:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

no, Bowser Sr. would be the person Bowser Jr. is named after: his father, Bowser. if Bowser's father was also named Bowser, then Bowser would be Bowser Jr., and Bowser Jr. would be Bowser the 3rd. So shut up when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
also, why the fuck would I care about the fanfiction names of non-canon characters? fool75.69.230.146