User talk:75.55.39.225

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The continuing personal attacks are unacceptable. Bzuk (talk) 07:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC).

Mr Bzuk, it is you who is initiating personal attacks, referencing your allegation of a "loopy" post on an editors page. Have I called contest with that? No, I haven't. You have misinterpreted my posts and accused me of things I haven't done. You have held my posts up to mockery by other editors, citing statements I never made (claims of satanical images when those claims were yours). If you try to have me blocked from posting I'll have to mention your deliberate altering of the truth. And thank you very much for your courtesy.--75.55.39.225 (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
I've responded to your note on my talk page. Meanwhile, I have a request: Please consider putting your effort into tracking down a citation to support your assertions about the drawing. You're not going to get anywhere without backing up your proposed edit through a citation which other editors and readers can verify. I don't know if you've taken the time to read Wikipedia policy about original research and verifiable sources. If you haven't please take a few minutes to do so. Thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
And thank you so much for your courtesy. I've responded on your talk page, your kindness is appreciated.
And for Mr. Bzuk, thank you for not having me blocked, that was quite civil of you. But again I'd like to draw an analogy between Canadians and Americans: I would never try to have you blocked no matter how much you disagree with me! Thank you for your generosity! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.158.1 (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Rudget. 14:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This block was levied against me by Mr. Bzuk, an editor or admin who made it his personal duty to discredit and disrupt a post I made about an unusual symbol which appears in the movie "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town." In no instance did I use profane or threatening language, in fact Mr. Bzuk continuously threatened me. My posts could not be construed as "taunting" no matter how they were viewed, rather Mr. Bzuk's were. These posts were made on talk pages, never the main article's page. Mr. Bzuk seemed to be irritated about something other than these posts, he gained his momentum from somewhere else, as the posts weren't of the sort to raise anyone's ire or sense of passion to the level that Mr. Bzuk reached. Mr. Bzuk himself violated Wikipedia rules by posting the screen shot in question on editor's talk pages, then removed it citing something about not being able to use it outside of "mainspace." Then why did Bzuk do that, if he wasn't supposed to? Does he alter Wikipedia policies at his pleasure?

Mr. Bzuk's accusations of "Wikistalking" are unfounded; the posts on the individual user's pages were responses to the editors themselves, not Mr. Bzuk. Mr. Bzuk was the stalker here. Mr. Bzuk was mentioned in the posts, but again the threats or intimidation were in the imagination of Mr. Bzuk, and not in fact. And it's true, Mr. Bzuk was the poster who claimed the image was satanical, I merely referenced the success of using it in the entertainment industry. This is not a personal attack upon Mr. Bzuk, it's what he said. Here he has twisted the truth to fit his perception of it, and that's what this whole issue is about.

Whether or not the image is 666 is the question; is it meant to be a subliminal? What was its purpose? It does appear as 999 in the picture, but the handwriting is upside down in this position. When the picture is spun around, when the handwriting is readable, then the symbol is 666. So, in at least one position the 666 symbol is seen. Mr. Bzuk never addressed this issue, or responded to questions about it. Here his avoidance of a simple question took the form of this block.

Mr. Bzuk cannot efface this image by this block, it will still be in the movie when this block expires and I will be able to resume posting. Mr. Bzuk's attempt at censorship is evident to even the most uninitiated, he seeks to hide the truth from the users of Wikipedia. The continued requests of a reliable source will be met after the weekend is over, you'll notice I made no posts on the movie article page or the talk page. Mr. Bzuk's request for a block is for his own benefit, whatever interest he has for interfering with a discussion on other editor's pages (not his own, and discussions that never would have happened if he hadn't been baiting people on the movie's Discussion page) and the movie's Discussion page (not the article page, please remember that) show his interest to be in other fields, ones not in keeping with bringing factual information to Wikipedia.

And there it is, Wikipedia employs Mr. Bzuk as an editor even when he has demonstrated a continuous effort at keeping truth from Wikipedia pages. I request that you fire Mr. Bzuk as an editor, as he'd rather display his concept of truth on your pages rather than the truth itself. And that's what your site is supposed to be about, the truth.

I'd like to ask that my block be lifted and that Mr. Bzuk be restrained from harassing me any longer.

Thank you.--76.212.157.7 (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "This itself shows your IP is changing, so no need for an unblock. Rudget. 16:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Thank you for your response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.157.7 (talk) 16:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 666 and Mr. Deeds Goes to Town

I am unaware of any significance of this information, and Wikipedia's general notability criteria indicates that no information can be included in Wikipedia if it does not have at least a significant and notable minority representation in media, research, et. al. Since it does not appear that this fact regarding the image you presented has such representation, it unfortunately cannot be included here. It is better suited to sites which present obsure information, and related conjectures. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. That type of site is not this one, you are right. You are right about that.
You're right, though.--76.248.229.209 (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)