User talk:75.44.146.95

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Alientraveller 19:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Petrelli. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop abusing the Peter Petrelli article. We've removed your edits several times today and will continue to do so. The information you are trying to add has been the source of a lot of speculation and fan cruft for several weeks. It has been rmoved due to the volume of speculation and original research it produces. Please do not continue these revert wars or I'll be forced to speak with an admin about further steps. Padillah (talk) 20:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Petrelli, you will be blocked from editing. Josh (talk | contribs) 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Peter Petrelli. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Josh (talk | contribs) 21:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Peter Petrelli. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Ckatzchatspy 21:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Petrelli, you will be blocked from editing. Josh (talk | contribs) 21:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Peter Petrelli‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Also, you don't seem to be supporting your claims with citation, or providing edit summaries to explain your actions, so they can only be seen as hostile to the encyclopedia. Pharmboy (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Peter Petrelli‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Pharmboy (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

It would be good if you checked out the welcome page and looked through Wikipedia policies and guidelines before doing any further editing. Some of your edits have been constructive, others have been quite disruptive. Jmjanssen (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. BencherliteTalk 22:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

.

UNBLOCK ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!