User talk:75.35.132.212

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding your Edits to history

All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and without bias all significant views that have been published by a reliable source.

To say something in the history textbook is not true is considered your point of view and is against the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. If you want a debate, go to a history forum, see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not--Skyfiler 00:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

If you have content dispute with others, do not waste time on edit wars. Talk pages are there to solve this kind of dispute. --Skyfiler 00:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

  • It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --—Khoikhoi 00:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please don't remove text according your point of view. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias. If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, a good idea is to move it to the talk page. Alternatively, you may tag the sentence by adding the {{fact}} template, or tag the article by adding {{not verified}} or {{unsourced}}. Also in that case it may be helpful for your co-editors to leave a clarifying note on the talk page, for instance indicating which sources you already checked.--Skyfiler 00:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please discuss the contents of images used on Wikipedia on the talk page--Skyfiler 00:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please don't remove image according your point of view. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias. If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, a good idea is to move it to the talk page. --Skyfiler 01:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

If you tag some well published text finctional, please add your sources, as described in Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If a user makes an addition which you consider POV or generally bad, rather than revert them and hope not to be reverted again, a more productive option is to move their content to the article's talk page where it can be discussed. While the content is still removed from the article, it is a less harsh move because the content is still viewable outside of history, and is more easily referenced in discussion.--Skyfiler 01:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Skyfiler 01:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please start another article instead of making copies around

It is easier to maintain.--Skyfiler 01:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Zhou Dynasty. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. —Khoikhoi 01:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I have reported your repeated violations of WP:3RR of Western Xia at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. siafu 02:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. — ERcheck (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)