User talk:75.3.251.3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 75.3.251.3, is registered to Southwestern Bell Internet. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Southwestern Bell Internet to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Southwestern Bell Internet, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).
An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by CompScientist.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CompScientist for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CompScientist for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Nissan GT-R. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

To elaborate: You posted a report that Uggz had deleted another editor's talk page post three times. You did not provide diffs and I could not find them in recent edits to Talk:Nissan GT-R. Looking further, I found pthis and began to suspect your AIV report was mere payback for a recently-opened sockpuppetry case.

If your report was spurious, I suggest you apologize to him. If you do not, I would ask any admin reviewing your conduct to consider appropriate measures. And if this is a genuine content dispute, take it to WP:AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Never mind. I reviewed the sockpuppetry case and found other instances of other Southwestern Bell IPs with a contentious interest in Supercar and Nissan GT-R making malicious and false reports to AIV. I won't hear any counterarguments, not for a while. I'm blocking you.

I will also be extending CompScientist's block for this. Have a nice day. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of not only being a likely sockpuppet of CompScientist but defaming other users by making malicious and utterly false reports of vandalism by them to AIV for three months. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Page blanking/deleting without expressing specific reasons, this is all vandalism to me and according to wiki's policies."

Decline reason: "No reason given. — Lara❤Love 05:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I simply follow wikipedia's policies. The other editors have harrassed my post although I follow wiki's policies look at the following changes and warnings; [redacted for formatting]"

Decline reason: "Arguing a modified version of tu quoque doesn't fly with me, sorry. I endorse the decision to block, and see no reason provided here to overturn it. The evidence of malicious behaviour looks very evident. Daniel 14:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

}}